CO129-276 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [6-8] — Page 171

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Perry's claim to compensation in respect of the lot in question.

Mr. Perry is at fault in his statement that many others besides himself failed to comply with the sixth condition of purchase without incurring the penalty under the ninth condition, and he is inaccurate as to the amount of premium paid by him, being $270 and not $170, and not $975 as stated.

As regards Mr. Perry's contention that he was well known to the Treasurer, and that it would therefore have been easy for him to inform that his Crown rent was in arrear, I cannot admit that it is the duty of the Treasurer to distinguish between persons known and persons unknown to him, and there is no reason to doubt that the usual procedure was followed.

Edit History

2026-05-29 06:09:12 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Perry's claim to compensation in respect of the lot in question. Mr. Perry is at fault in his statement that many others besides himself failed to comply with the sixth condition of purchase without incurring the penalty under the ninth condition, and he is inaccurate as to the amount of premium paid by him, being $270 and not $170, and not $975 as stated. As regards Mr. Perry's contention that he was well known to the Treasurer, and that it would therefore have been easy for him to inform that his Crown rent was in arrear, I cannot admit that it is the duty of the Treasurer to distinguish between persons known and persons unknown to him, and there is no reason to doubt that the usual procedure was followed.
Baseline (Original)
Perry's claim to compensation in respect of the lot in question. Mr. Perry is at fault in his statement that many others besides hims self failed to comply with the sixth condition of pur- chase without incurring the penalty under the ninth further condition, and he is inaccurate as to the amount of premium paid by him, being $270 and the sum not 170 not $975 as stated. As regards Mr. Perry's contention that he مصر well known to the Treasurer, and that it would there- to in fore have been easy form him that his Crown rent was in arrear, I ean not admit that it is the duty of the Treasurer to distinguish between persons known and persons unknown to him, and there is no reason to doubt that the usual A
2026-05-29 06:09:12 · Baseline
View content

Perry's claim to compensation in respect of the lot in

question.

Mr. Perry

is at fault in his statement that many others besides hims self failed to comply with the sixth condition of pur- chase without incurring the penalty under the ninth

further

condition, and he is inaccurate as to the amount

of premium paid by him,

being $270 and

the sum

not

170

not $975 as stated.

As regards Mr. Perry's

contention that he

مصر

well known to the Treasurer,

and that it would there- to in

fore have been easy form him that his Crown

rent was in arrear,

I

ean

not admit that it is the duty of the Treasurer to distinguish between persons known and persons unknown to him, and there is no

reason to doubt that the

usual

A

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.